Rogers has reached a new low, High Speed Internet Isp
| Posted by Hungry Lion at 21 July 2008 15:52 | |
Hi, I'm Lion Loomis, welcome to my den. Read my collection carefully, I am behind you...... |
Over at high speed internet isp it is valid. I would say that it is past due to happen again. What do you think that spiraled kind of information is worth?
Everyday if all of us who can make the same choice, it will be amazing. Yeah, I like to read this:
If we exclude resellers, there aren't too many Internet Service Providers (ISP) available to residential customers in Canada. It is in fact my understanding that the market of ISP who own their own infrastructure in Toronto is limited to a duopoly between Rogers and Bell. I've been with Rogers for the past two and the half years and I must say their service has always been quite satisfactory in terms of speed and reliability. At $54.95 per month they are not exactly cheap, and they place a cap .. Read the rest of this entry.
When the going gets very rough or too easy, those who are pursuing the greater good may feel a stronger compulsion to keep on pushing.
Bell Canada has responded to CAIP's (Canadian Association of Internet Providers) request for an "extension and disclosure" of information. In its previous filing certain information was lodged 'in confidence' with the CRTC Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission) and it now seems the company used GAS customers' (an ISP) private information in the filing, and we haven't been privileged to know the source of the data. Here's Bell's response to CAIP's request for an ..[more].
Every author appreciates hearing the words 'thank you that was a lovely work.'
Futurists, especially those who claim to have a methodology beyond psychic prediction, tend to rely primarily on Moore's Law for figuring out what technology will be like 5, 10, or 20 years from now. Nevertheless Moore's Law, which predicts that computing power will drop in cost by 50 percent every 18 months, isn't some absolute speed limit and some measures of technical achievement are actually moving faster than Moore's Law predicts. It's not that they violate the law (if it even IS a law) but that ..next.
Once again, I thank you for being patient and putting up with my warped sense of humor.
0 Comments:




